COPs Program

The Citizens' Oversight Panels (COPs) are an organizational structure designed to empower the citizen to take control of a huge government that is seriously out of control. Even those responsible for understanding what these bodies are doing are overwhelmed by the sheer immensity of the problem. However, with citizen volunteers, we can turn an intractable problem into a managable one.

As a COPs panelist, you will become a fixture at the meetings of a particular board, council, or other body, not to mention specific elected officials. We may also have panels that will oversee specific outsourced contracts, work that would normally be done by governmental institutions, but for some reason contracted out to the lowest bidder, or perhaps to a friend or campaign contributor, you know how it works.

Being a panelist is not an endorsement by the Club, or the Democratic Party of San Diego County. However, panelists who complete their term of service may list it on their resume and in any election materials. As you can imagine, being on the Citizens' Oversight Panel for a particular body will be a huge asset when going into an election against an entrenched incumbent.

This oversight responsibility was well recognized as crucial to our democracy, and was originally called the "Council of Censors". Please see the following website for the historical documents with regard to this organ of our historical founding fathers: http://www.councilofcensorspa.org/

The framers of the 1776 Pennsylvania constitution did not trust solely to "a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments of government" to protect the people against oppression and tyranny. They introduced a special organ of government for this purpose, called the council of censors. The censors were charged with the duties of inquiring whether the constitution had been preserved inviolate, and whether the government had performed their duties properly without assuming unconstitutional powers. They were also to inquire whether the public taxes had been justly levied and collected, in what manner they had been spent, and whether the laws had been duly executed. They were empowered to send for persons, papers, and records, to pass public censures, to order impeachments, and to recommend to the legislature the repeal of such laws as should appear to them to have been enacted contrary to the principles of the constitution. Furthermore, they were empowered to call by a two-thirds vote a constitutional convention to amend any article of the constitution which might be defective, explain such as might be thought not clearly expressed, and add such as might be necessary for the preservation of the rights and happiness of the people.

If you have any further questions, please call Raymond Lutz directly, at 619-820-5321.

Resources

  • District Attorney of the County of San Diego, Bonnie Dumanis
    • Special Operations Division, Public Integrity Unit: 619-531-4051
      • Leon Schorr - Talked on the Phone.
      • Mr. O'Toole
  • Are speakers from the public required to provide their name and address in order to speak?
    • I asked this question to the State Attorney General's office, and I received a call from Ted Prim. He said that his office informally advises the public that members of the public do NOT need to identify themselves or provide their address. He said that to get an official written opinion on this issue would require a request by a member of the assembly or senate and then it would take six months to complete.

  • Dunn & Bradstreet run a website called the Selectory ( http://www.selectory.com ) the has a powerful search tool for parent companies and their subs in North America (including Mexico & Canada). An alternative site is http://www.referenceusa.com . both require paid memberships, but could prove an invaluable tool for researching board members and their spiderweb of affiliations.

COPs Projects And Citations

COPs Administration Notes

  • COPs Video Squads - notes for logistics of creating video of governmental meetings.

-- Raymond Lutz - 07 Jan 2007

Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
pdfpdf 0113_calaware_Public_Access_to_Law_Enforcement_Information_Audit_Report.pdf manage 85.8 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz Calaware law enforcemetn audit report
pdfpdf COPSBrochure.pdf manage 1953.6 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz COPs Brochure. Print and distribute!
docrtf COPs_Proposal_V2.rtf manage 50.8 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz COPS Proposal
docdoc NewsRelease1-06-07-FINAL.doc manage 94.5 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz News Release: COPS to Police Local Govt.
pdfpdf NewsRelease1-06-07-FINAL.pdf manage 91.0 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz  
docdoc PanelistQuestionnaire.doc manage 92.5 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz Panelist Application / Questionnaire
pdfpdf PanelistQuestionnaire.pdf manage 70.3 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz Panelist Application / Questionnaire (PDF)
pdfpdf Top10_FirstAmendment.pdf manage 193.3 K 2008-07-10 - 17:57 Raymond Lutz Top ten points on First Amendment rights
Topic revision: r31 - 2008-05-07 - 20:50:06 - Raymond Lutz
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding CopsWiki? Send feedback