![]() DON KOHLBAUER / Union-Tribune
Darcel Hulse, the president of Sempra's LNG subsidiary, gave a tour last month of Sempra Energy's liquefied natural gas terminal under construction in Baja California.
|
|
An adjacent plant – not yet under construction – will convert the LNG back to natural gas and transport it by pipeline, a portion of which is yet to be built, into a grid that connects Baja California with California, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.
Current consumption on that system is about 9.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas a day. When Energía Costa Azul starts operating, Sempra and Shell will add 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas a day to the system.
"It obviously feels good," Hulse said. "To us, it's not a race. We saw the need before others saw it. . . . It's more important that it will make a better place for our children and grandchildren, that you've not just taken from this life but given back."
Choosing Mexico appears to have worked in Sempra's favor in getting its LNG receiving terminal under construction.
Liquefied natural gas was an unknown quantity to both Sempra and Mexico a few years ago. But Mexican federal officials, who are encouraging LNG projects and who had worked with the company in previous energy ventures, moved quickly to issue the company's development permits.
"One of the few places available in the Pacific for these projects is Mexico. They can take advantage of using the gas in Baja California and also having it shipped to Southern California, where opposition is so great it's difficult for projects to get built," said David Shields, a Mexican journalist who specializes in energy issues.
Despite Sempra's warm welcome in Mexico City, it was received in Baja California with resistance from environmentalists, surfers, fishermen, opposition politicians, citizen groups, and residents and the developer of Bajamar, the golf resort directly north of Costa Azul.
Numerous lawsuits challenging the project are pending in courts on both sides of the border. An inquiry is being conducted in the Baja California legislature. And a referendum is being considered that would bar any LNG terminal from the state.
"They might have the project under construction, but that doesn't mean it's going to get built," said Bill Powers, a San Diego environmental engineer and organizer of Ratepayers for Affordable and Clean Energy, a binational coalition of critics of the development.
Sempra executives say they have tried to meet with all interested parties to explain the project's many benefits, which include construction jobs for more than 350 Baja California residents, indirect economic effects totaling $350 million, and long-term tax revenue.
| Title | Sempra's gas venture gathering steam at Baja site |
| Publisher | Union Tribune |
| Author | Diane Lindquist |
| Pub Date | 2005-11-24 |
| Media Link | http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051024/news_1n24sempra.html |
| Embed HTML | |
| Note | |
| Keywords | Sunrise Powerlink |
| Media Type | Linked Article |
| Curator Rating | Plain |
| Book ISBN | |
| Author Name Sortable |
Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.