NOTICE: This is a static version of the wiki site. Please excuse, not all features are operating, but response will be much faster!

Roque de la Fuente vote loss analysis

CitizensOversight (2016-11-16) RoqueDeLaFuente

This Page: https://https://copswiki.org/Common/M1714


More Info: ElectionIntegrity

The voting tallies are attached along with all relevant screenshots. Below are my notes, methodology, analysis, and conclusion.

Notes:

#1 Data for a greentextstate comes from the state's official website.

text#2 Data for an orangetextstate comes from Politico.com.

text#3 This analysis is over the states where De La Fuente was on the ballot.

text

textMethodology:

textStep 1: Screenshots were taken by 6 different people in 4 different states in 2 different time zones as the results were coming in to individual state websites and Politico.com.

Step 2: All screenshots were gathered and entered into the Excel spreadsheet attached based on how "Rocky" Roque De La Fuente's vote totals progressed throughout the night in each state.

Step 3: Whenever Mr. De La Fuente's vote totals went down, the screenshot at that moment in time was compared to the previous one taken to pinpoint what county lowered the vote total. If the county information was not captured then the timeframe of the drop in votes was listed.

textAnalysis:

text#1 Nothing abnormal was found in any data gathered from a state's official website. This includes Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Montana and Rhode Island.

text

text#2 Nothing abnormal was found in data gathered from Politico in the following states: Idaho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

text

text#3 Florida data from Politico showed two problems. The first is that De La Fuente's vote total dropped from text897 text at 39.1% reporting to text124 textat 78.1% reporting in text St. Lucie County text. textDe La Fuente was the only candidate to lose votes here.text The second is that De La Fuente's vote total dropped from text4,188 text at 48.2% reporting to text503 text at 62.9% reporting in textBroward County text. textDe La Fuente was the only candidate to lose votes here.text See FL1,2,3,4.

text

text#4 Kentucky data from Politico showed De La Fuente's vote total drop from text105 text at 100% reporting to text0 text also at 100% reporting in textOhio County text. textDe La Fuente's votes were given to McMullin text who jumped from 0 votes to 105. See KY1,2.

text

text#5 New Hampshire data from Politico showed De La Fuente's vote total dropped from text1,179 text at 52.9% reporting to text27 text at 70.6% in Sullivan County. textDe La Fuente was the only candidate to lose votes here.text See NH1,2.

text

text#6 New Jersey data from Politico showed De La Fuente's vote total drop from text1,820 text at 44.3% reporting to text1,230 text at 80.9% reporting overall. textDe La Fuente was the only candidate to lose votes here.text I was unable to determine which county was responsible for this, but I do know it happened between 11:12pm and 12:05am EST. See NH1,2.

text

text#7 North Dakota data from Politico showed De La Fuente's vote total drop from text20 text at 100% reporting to text 1 text also at 100% reporting in textWalsh County text. textStein, Castle and De La Fuente lost votes here text. See ND1,2.

text

text#8 textTennessee data from Politico showed two problems. The first is that De La Fuente's vote total dropped from text533text at 50% reporting to text10 textat 100% reporting in textMacon Countytext. textDe La Fuente was the only candidate to lose votes here.text The second is that De La Fuente's vote total dropped from text346text at 82.4% reporting to text122text at 98.8% reporting in textKnox Countytext. textJohnson andtext textDe La Fuente were the only candidates to lose votes here.text See TN1,2,3,4.

text

textConclusion:

textIf De La Fuente's campaign wants to challenge the votes tallies, good places to pursue would be: NOTE: Depending on how the website totals were generated, it could have been human error entering the numbers throughout the canvass period.

text

textBroward and St. Lucie Counties, Florida

textOhio County, Kentucky

textSullivan County, New Hampshire

textWalsh County, North Dakota

textKnox and Macon Counties, Tennessee

The state of New Jersey, specifically results that were reported between 11:12pm and 12:05am EST

  • 12539046-politico-nh-and-tx-vote-fraud.jpg:
    12539046-politico-nh-and-tx-vote-fraud.jpg