Share Button

Judge says county must change vote counting procedures in future elections

Union Tribune (31 Jan 2017) Joshua Stewart

This Page:
Media Link:
More Info: Election Audit Lawsuit

Judge says county must change vote counting procedures in future elections


Ray Lutz, the national coordinator of Citizens’ Oversight, at his El Cajon home. (K.C. Alfred / The San Diego Union-Tribune)

Joshua StewartJoshua StewartContact Reporter

A judge has determined that San Diego County didn’t follow proper procedures in an audit of the June primary election and must use a different process when verifying future contests.

In a Jan. 10 judgment, San Diego Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil determined that state election law says all mail-in ballots need to be included in a manual count of votes from 1 percent of precincts.

Previously the County Registrar of Voters only used mail-in ballots received by Election Day in its manual count, while excluding mail-in votes received after polls closed. All ballots - including votes cast by mail, at polling places and accepted provisional ballots - are counted toward election results, but only a small portion are used in an audit used to double-check that votes are accurately counted by automated tabulation systems.

Ray Lutz, the head of government watchdog organization Citizens Oversight Inc., said in his lawsuit that all types of ballots cast, including mail-in votes received by the registrar before and after Election Day as well as provisional ballots, should be included in the manual tally to ensure that election fraud has not occurred

The court agreed with Lutz in part. Wohlfeil determined that all legally-cast mail-in ballots can be used in its audit, regardless of when the registrar receives the returned ballot. The judge disagreed, however, that provisional ballots must also be used in the audit.

“The judge ruled provisionals do not need to be in the 1 (percent) manual tally. We agree with this. He also ruled more vote-by-mail ballots need to be included. We do not agree with this,” county spokesman Michael Workman said.

The decision will make elections more expensive and could make it difficult for the Registrar of Voters to finish counting ballots ahead of deadlines included in state law, he said.

Both Lutz and San Diego County said they plan to appeal.

“We always planned to appeal it because it only applies to San Diego County. It has to go through appeals to apply to all the counties,” Lutz said.

The decision has no retroactive effect on the June primary, or the November general election.

Lutz, however, said the county’s auditing method left it susceptible to voter fraud, and he believes that Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders would have won the Democratic nomination for president and ultimately the White House had different procedures been used in the California primary. Sander’s rival, Hillary Clinton, had already won support from enough Democratic delegates to secure the nomination before the state’s June 7 primary.


Media Form edit

Title Judge says county must change vote counting procedures in future elections
Publisher Union Tribune
Author Joshua Stewart
Pub Date 31 Jan 2017
Media Link
Remote Link
Embed HTML
Forum Link
Keywords Election Audit Lawsuit
Related Keywords Election Integrity, Snapshot Protocol, Snapshot Protocol
Media Type Linked Article, Article
Media Group News
Curator Rating Plain
Author Name Sortable
Thumbnail Link
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
sd-jostewart-1485916400-snap-photo.jpgjpg sd-jostewart-1485916400-snap-photo.jpg manage 28 K 28 Aug 2018 - 18:30 Raymond Lutz  
Topic revision: r2 - 20 Jun 2020, RaymondLutz
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Cops? Send feedback